CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
Record of Proceedings
Petition No.155/2008
Subject: Approval of tariff for Mejia Thermal Power Generating Station, Unit
Nos 5 & 6 (250 MW each) of Damodar Valley Corporation
Coram: Dr. Pramod Deo, Chairperson
Shri R.Krishnamoorthy, Member
Shri S.Jayaraman, Member
Shri V.S.Verma, Member
Date of Hearing: 16.6.2009
Petitioners: Damodar Valley Corporation, Kolkatta
Respondents: WBSEDCL, JSEB and MPPTCL
Parties present: Shri M.G.Ramachandran, Advocate, DVC
Shri T.K.Gupta, DVC
Shri D.K.Majumdar, DVC
Shri P.K.Choudhuri, DVC
Shri A.Biswas, DVC
Shri D.K.Aich, DVC
Shri P.Bhattacharya, DVC
Shri. R.Goswami, DVC
Shri G.Bhunia, DVC
Shri G. Chaudhury, DVC
Shri Shyamal Sarkar, Advocate, BSAL
Shri Gautam Shroff, Advocate, BSAL
Shri K.P.Roy, BSAL
This petition has been filed by the petitioner, Damodar Valley Corporation for
approval of tariff for Mejia Thermal Power Station, Unit Nos 5 & 6 (250 MW each)
(hereinafter referred to as “the generating station”) from the dates of commercial
operation up to 31.3.2009.
2. Unit Nos.5 and 6 of the generating station was commissioned on 29.2.2008 and
24.9.2008 respectively. The petitioner has been supplying power from Unit-5 of the
generating station to the respondents, in terms of the single part provisional tariff of Rs
2.90/kWh approved by the Commission vide its order dated 30.4.2008 in I.A.No.4/2008
in Petition No. 53/2008, subject to the adjustment after approval of final tariff.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the tariff for the generating
station may be determined after taking into consideration the directions contained in the
judgment dated 23.11.2007 of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity in Appeal
No.273/2006 and the detailed information filed by it as desired by the Commission.
4. Learned counsel for Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd, (BSAL) one of the consumers of
electricity generated at the generating station, submitted that it had filed an appeal
before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the judgment dated 23.11.2007 in Appeal
No.273/2006 and other related appeals. Learned counsel further submitted that subject
to the outcome of the appeals, the tariff of the generating station may be fixed after
considering the directions of the Appellate Tribunal in its judgment dated 23.11.2007,
particularly with reference to the debt-equity ratio of the projects commissioned after the
year 1992.
5. The petitioner was directed to submit the following information on affidavit, along
with soft copies, latest by 30.6.2009, with advance copy to the respondents.
(a) Details of deployment of actual equity during each quarter of the year after the
commencement of the project work and upto completion for Unit V and Unit VI
respectively.
(b) Details of deployment of each loan during each quarter of the year from the
commencement of the project work and upto completion, for computation of IDC
for Unit V and Unit VI respectively.
(c) Funding Pattern in Form No. 6.
(d) Price of HFO to be revised in terms of Rs/KL in Form-19 of the petition instead of
Rs/MT presently given.
6. Subject to the above, order in the petition was reserved.
Sd/-
K.S. Dhingra
Chief (Legal)
No comments:
Post a Comment